Posted tagged ‘Language’

Sexual Objectification and Women Born Transsexual: Finding a Common Language and Learning To Speak Together

December 21, 2011

I will warn you before you being to get into the meat of this that it could tweak places in your psyche that will leave you feeling angry, or hurt. Some might feel that I am supporting their views, or standing beside their cause, when I am not. Others might feel that I am disparaging their views, or themselves, when that is certainly not my intention.

But, there I was this morning on that inevitable, it seems, “social network,” Facebook, when I began to look at some pictures posted by a “facebook friend” (this one I know actually, or at least knew, as an embodied acquaintance some time ago.) The pictures were of a party held in a public place. There were a lot of people there.

The party seemed to have a Christmas shindig kinda atmosphere, from the pics, and everyone was dressed fairly formally. It was definitely not a sweatshirt and jeans sort of affair.

A number of the female participants, the pictures were mostly of females, not males, were dressed in some remarkably revealing and short skirted dresses. Just absolutely gorgeous outfits were on display. The group of people seemed very festive. The party appeared to have been at a bar.

I’m intentionally setting a stage and am intentionally hesitant to wade into the deeper end of the pool I am trying to examine. I hesitate, because there are perfectly lovely people who may read this who will believe that I look down on them, I am almost certain of that.

Then I also hesitate because there are certain characters that might also read this and somehow imagine that I have changed my mind and now hew a course more closely aligned with their own political brand.

The truth is rather more complex. (Isn’t it always?) Brief and partisan “takes” are generally not quite so encompassingly valid as we would imagine when our emotions are tweaked. The truth is that through the years I have changed my mind a couple of times about the following subject matter. This particular post isn’t a change of mind; it’s an examination of something I hadn’t consciously noticed. It is an essay about something I’ve noticed and had a sort of visceral reaction to. But, as the reaction has been visceral, I have, of course, not examined it in any depth. I have merely felt it.

[A brief aside, my partner and I discussed feeling and examining this morning over breakfast in terms of practitioner resistance to dialectical-behavioral therapy vis-à-vis client interactions. One cannot continue to talk in opprobrious terminology: “splitting, attachment, borderline” while working with clients who have been so-designated. Why? Because the language one thinks she knows and can “handle” is merely a group of code-words that tack on alleged qualities that do not describe behavior, or even feeling, unless it is the feeling of the therapist herself that’s described by the absence of any sort of clear description. In other words, I can label you a sociopath or a fetishist, but those words tend to show my own prejudices and when I use them they mayn’t relate at all to what you may be talking about while using the same words. Human communication is a dicey game indeed.]

Aside, aside, I’m ready to continue. The party appeared to be one that had a number of transgender people were in attendance. How could I tell? Well, how could you tell? Just accept that I know what I saw, alright? Now, it wasn’t easy to winnow further and “know” whether there were transsexuals and cross-dressers and the so-called genetic women among the party-goers. (Oops, that word almost led to another aside about, Nell, the 1994 Jodie Foster vehicle!)

Anyway, I realized that I was having some sort of reaction. It wasn’t a horrified one, or a dismissive one. It was simply a reaction to some of the dress and some of the motions that I saw in the pictures. Then, I also knew that many of the participants had gotten drunk and that added to the reaction.

Some of you are prolly already aware of the reaction I am about to describe. Hell, you may be having it yourself as you read. The reaction was something like “Damn! Don’t they know how unsafe it is to get drunk and go back out dressed like that? Think of what might occur!”

Ah-ha. Wait for it, I’m getting there.

Preface: I have, on occasion worn skirts that show off what have been a really nice set of legs. I know, “Don’t hate me because I’m beautiful!” 1980s, Pantene, Kelly LeBrock: But, how many of us went right out and tried the shampoo and conditioner and still use it, perhaps? Memes are effective, aren’t they? But there is also this fact, anytime I decide to show off some leg I also have this alarm that sounds within me. Actually, two alarms.

Alarm one is: “damn, girl, is that going to be safe to wear?” Alarm two is related but slightly different, “Is this more of the reaction to rape syndrome you struggled so hard to get past?” sigh And here we begin to descend into the matter at hand.

My reaction to the pictures was something like: it must be nice to not have to consider the reaction of men to your dresses.

The second was more like, well, perhaps that’s just the reason, men don’t notice such things. They will dress in ways that do attract attention, do attract those who might not otherwise incline themselves to attraction to that person. In other words, this is just a bunch of men dressing up like women. BAM

There it was. It rose up, that resentment and the “they’re really men” meme. And, perhaps, most of those in those pics would agree that they are men. Crossdressers are not the same as women, right? I think most of them would agree that that’s prolly true. But, they and I both also agree that they are fully human and deserving of every consideration I grant to other human beings.

Of course the rub comes when people who’ve been dysphoric for decades inside of bodies they do not want and don’t feel comfortable with look at those pics and react in some fashion like: “they’re not like me, they’re disgusting and need to be alienated from transsexuals because they will queer the pitch for us.” There are many women born transsexual who would have such a reaction. Yep, I’ve had it as well.

I have both embraced the separatist ideals and have rejected them as well. But, I also have that reaction when I see what I see. And it does strike me very deeply as being exactly what many movement feminists from the 60s and 70s have called it: a sexualization of women’s bodies by men.

But, were it simply that simple, then I’d hardly need to write an essay and try to work out for myself what was and is going on. I think this isn’t as simple as separatist of any sort and Prince-followers on either side are willing to try to make it.

Humanity finds it easy to make wars. Most of us don’t want to work hard enough to make peace. Prolly why divorce rates remain high among heterosexuals and relationships are so hard to come by for many of us. The work can be excruciating. Hence, it’s much easier for Mary Daly to have made hateful statements about a group of women she never took time to know, than it would have been for her to actually get to know transsexuals and crossdressers. Hence, it’s easier for some transsexuals to dismiss crossdressers than it would be for people to work at relationship. (yes, I know, “years ago I was betrayed by crossdressers, transgenders, men, whatever and I will never put myself in that position again.” I respect that, but since your reaction is PTSD-related: the trauma of those betrayals such that you continue to live them, perhaps you could speak with a therapist about working through this ideation?

It’s not that the event was imaginary, or that it didn’t hurt me. The problem was that for years I relived those hours in my mind and acted as if, many times, they were still occurring. Working them out with a therapist wasn’t a sign that I was insane. It was a sign that I was willing to get better and take more charge of my life and who I am. Those are good things, not shameful ones.

Perhaps, there is a more simple answer and perhaps it’s already “out there.” Perhaps we haven’t looked at all deeply into the answer.

Perhaps the answer is, indeed, that it’s a much easier thing for men to sexualize women than it is for women to sexualize our selves. Perhaps the millennia of patriarchal oppression and training have given us a wariness of our own sexual selves.

Perhaps, being “taught” by means of sexual assault or rape of children have made sexualization of one’s self a frightening prospect and to view those who don’t seem to know the dangers is to have a deep and lasting resentment rise inside of one’s self. And just maybe I resent the fuck outta the men who wanna dress in femme garb and flaunt their sexual selves and lead others to think that women are just as fearfully sexual as church fathers and lineages of rabbis have said!

Perhaps, when I can remove the clothing, or remove the light voice or remove the perfume and make-up and the next morning dress in a white shirt, a pin-striped suit, a tie and shoes and then splash on Old Spice and meet the guys at the gym after work. Well, perhaps it IS easier for me to forget just how dangerous it seems to have dressed as a woman the night before and worn a very sexy outfit.

There is resentment. Isn’t there? I can feel it. “Why can’t I?” “Why should I live in trepidation and you don’t have to?” “Doncha know that dress could lead to rape?” — Even among those of us who know better, it becomes so easy to blame the fact of sexual assault on the way a woman dresses, eh? –That training runs deep, doesn’t it? How long is that train you’re trying to brake? That makes a difference in stopping times, doesn’t it?

Layers and layers to uncover and many of us don’t take the time to analyze, to find vocabulary that describes behavior that we can observe and come to some agreement that we can share a common vocabulary. Instead too many of us are involved with sharing our feelings, our reactions, our PTSD with others. Thus, the conversation never gets started because we are at the Tower of Babel and we’re all speaking in different tongues.

I think that if women can embrace our sexuality that would be a very good thing. Instead we have millennia of training and repression that say things like “she brought that on herself.” Did you see what se was wearing.” “How could she get that loaded?” Recriminate, fulminate, enrage.

Those are the contents of too many of our conversations, too many of our attempts to communicate are attempts to communicate instead an incoherent rage and anger at experiences. I understand that, quite well.

I have felt the alienation and rejection of transitioning from the outward appearance of one sex to the outward appearance of my own sex. I have felt the horror, the self-condemnation of the aftermath of rape. I have felt the demeaning sense of having my mouth shut for me by others. I have felt the fear of when will a beating stop and the fear that the next minute would see my death. Those feelings are basically beyond quantification and observation and rational expression while I am enmeshed with them.

When such feelings rule my quotidian existence I cannot conceive of any idea or behavioral expression that might not place me back into fear of immediate death. It’s only when I come to a place where I realize that I may or may not die in the next moment, but I will not die of a rape that isn’t happening any longer. … Then I become more able to find a common language with another.

But that language will not come about through fear mongering about the never before occurred becoming commonplace, nor will it come about through belaboring the obvious: “you are not like me.” It comes only when I see the obvious with the fear of death.

Au contraire, Radha, you are human and so am I. I bleed; you bleed. You desire connection; I desire connection. Perhaps we can attempt to make connection with each other? Perhaps we can, indeed.

But first, we must find a language we can all speak and dismiss the notion that I can somehow quantify the person you are by labeling you in ways that are demeaning and painful and dismissive. None of that behavior makes my point. It only leads to more alienation.

I’ve had that a-plenty in my life. I’d rather not continue to build walls that keep me away from others. The first step for me is learning to be authentic and to demolish the poses I wish to replace the poses I lived before. Blessed be.

Occasionally

December 1, 2008

Occasionally, I think about why and where, when and how, who and what. Today is one of those occasions.

Who determines who else partakes in our lives? So often we give ourselves over to chance and circumstance. I believe we give destiny too much credit for what we do not otherwise have the perspicacity to understand and connect as cause and effect.

I grew up sheltered in so many respects. After a time, fearful to swim into the deep relational water of humanity’s ocean I gave into my own fear. I withdrew to a room where I read: Anne of Green Gables (feel in love with Nova Scotia,) Little Women and Eight Cousins, stuck on the adventuresome nature of Jo and wondered why I could not seem to be more like her. So easily free of the fears, I thought, that chained my own life.

Alone, so very often, in my room I read and wandered into other realms. I read books by Sam Delaney and Harlan Ellison, and then Tolkien. The poetry of Yeats and John Clare, William Blake and Emily Dickenson enchanted me.

So with friends. Lately the entire way I discover people has changed. Open and feeling rather free to simply be myself I find friends come to my hand now, after years of hiding myself away. Strangely, the friends and I hold passions in common, or a particular way of viewing the world. The freedom is to be oneself, not the cowering hidden soul crushed by doubt and fear.

A snatch of conversation overheard and an introduction I would never have attempted just eight years ago.

I’ve learned a willingness to be vulnerable at times. A willingness to launch that ocean journey on a brig trusting to the sea to bring me ashore in a piece rather than scattered among the reefs and rocks, food for tiny iridescent fishes and scuttling crabs.

The brig has yet to founder or run-aground. The cost of voyaging has been simply my fear and the freshness of allowing my own vulnerability to be clear rather than hidden.

There are places I do not go. I needn’t. My history fits rather nicely into that of “just another woman in the world.” No lies are necessary, and so, aren’t told. The truth of being oneself trumps those concerns I have read of for many years now. The key: to speak the heart and allow it to be there for others to see, or not, as they choose.

It is simply a matter of choosing whether to take the heading I have been taught, or the heading that presents itself in authenticity and relationship. What I think I have seen on BBs today and in the past is the overwhelming fear of a truthful honesty, one that presents the reality of the soul rather than the reality of the ways we are taught to think. Arguments over Truth are for those who require a constant guidebook on honesty and integrity. Sometimes those are only for people who read a how-to book on life and love, feeling and responsibility.

I cannot change another’s truth, and she or he must live that out as best they are able. My truth is that I am who I am. I must give way to the truthfulness of who Radha is and was, not some vague platitude that one size fits all. It is not a venture for everyone. Each one’s truth is separate from me. Live it as best you may. And go with the blessings of Mother.

My truth is this: yesterday the beehive huts on the Irish coast. Today, the wattled home of a priestess at Kildare, building a fire that brings light and warmth to a dwelling. Tying together stalks of herbs and grasses to freshen the interior air, dressing to go and tend Bridget’s fire. The difference is the difference in the west and the east/center of a very small island. Here, for me, the air is fresher.

Is it ever enough to parse and stretch and to make what I wish to be there there? I think that there is no end to that path, an endless wandering through blankness and the death of memory.

I cannot change what I recall. Would I could and make it different. Make a story I would truly enjoy, every minute of. But there is much that cannot be enjoyed, unless one thinks of it as a way toward learning.

All those pithy little adages, like “No pain, no gain.” No doubt coined by a football coach, drill-sergeant or someone who was born on third and thought she had hit a triple in life.

Some do. More power to them. Both those who hit triples against all odds and those who are born on third and think they have hit triples.

We start where we start and go on from there. Some things go well and other things go poorly. Remind me of that in a few weeks after four more papers and a major exam. Remind me of that when I trot off to take the national exam. *sigh*

But, better all that than four endless hours, or years and years of denying oneself the very right to exist.

I’ve truly enjoyed reading what others write at various forums. Yet, I often think that internet bulletin boards are frequented mostly by those of us who are, or were, lonely. We are lonely for a while and then don’t notice when we no longer are. Our behavior continues to draw us into it although the circumstances that made such behaviors a good and valuable response to our world have changed into a different pattern. But our lives do not change to match the changed circumstances.

The old ways of acting no longer provide what they once did. Or we remain stuck in behaviors that no longer repair us. They no longer bring congruence to what had been loneliness.

Life is full. My sorrows are just like most of yours, bearable with beginnings, middles and ends. At least until the next batch arrive. But, they also have those beginnings, middles and ends. Seems like life goes that way. Go with it.

Yesterday I began a short-story, but had no time except to jot down a few opening paragraphs before my partner and I took a road-trip up the Delaware almost to the end of the Water Gap. We passed through rain that turned to sleet and snow, gloried in a drab and gray day that allowed, for the time and place, me to work out some of the way I feel the story will go.

I plan to work on it. Hopefully can serialize it in this space. For me, it’s probably more important than anything I have placed here before. Why? It’s important because the story tells me a truth about myself. It tells me a couple of truths about myself. One is that the story itself tells me a truth just in the way it moves. The other major truth is that in writing it I will write in the way I would rather write: no polemics, no suggestions, simply a weaving of language to make color and character.

When it’s done, I hope you’ll like it for, I believe, it will be in so many ways truer than anything I have yet given you. But, be forewarned. The story isn’t biography. It’s a story only, it will be, maybe in some fashion, a biography of the soul. For me that seems far more important than the writing of thoughts about the life of women and men who have transsexing histories. For, when we come down to it, agitation, diatribes, political and social ideals, even psychology are lesser lights to the truth available through the telling of stories. 

Writer’s Bloc, Or Is It “Block”?

September 24, 2008

I have an essay in mind. In fact, it’s in heart, probably even soul; but I cannot write it today. Just one of those things. An experience occurs and one wishes to lay it “all out there” because it might click with someone else. But.

Yes, “but”. “But” one also knows that the power, the emotion, the concern she will not get it right, not that it would be wrong, “but” just too much, too soon, hangs like a vulture over the process of placing words in formations that will be both understandable to others and worth the writing for herself. 

Maybe not so much writer’s block as just a writer blocked by herself from writing about her own heart, her own experience. What does one give? How much is too much and how much isn’t quite enough? How many will read and come away with the exactly opposite feeling than she wanted to convey? *sigh* 

Writing is never an easy business. It is a business, ya know? O, we can mostly all do it, at least those who come to the Internet to read. But, no, as a friend has told me. “You’ve got to work at it. Most people don’t really read very well. Their writing isn’t serious. 

“I mean, they just slap stuff down. They haven’t a feel for the words and they haven’t spent years, like you, in finding what works for them and then sharpening that into something, I anyway, will find read-able.”

Yep, I agree with him. Writing can be for simple expression: “I think that sux.” Or, in some instances: “I git whut ur talkin boud, Jem.” OK, you think, maybe that’s just them using dialect. Later one finds that the ability to shape words and make them hang together is something that requires hard work, study, practice and a love of making sounds flow. Perhaps more like a composer of symphonic music gets to manage the various orchestral sections as she writes her score, bringing in, raising the tone, etc, etc. 

So, yes, there are definitely days when what one wishes to write, to post, is simply not the right day for presenting it. Things may still be too raw, too unbalanced to place anything down but a rant. On days like that I punt. Yep, pole a small, shallow water-craft out onto the river and drift and push myself elsewhere.

Today is for punting. Tomorrow may well be for writing. I hope so, because the irony and the emotion of the things I wish to write about well inside me like a closed spring holds water until, eventually, it must burst through somewhere.

We all find our level and make whatever accomodation to a situation, or a myriad of situations, in order to get it out. The trick is, learning to know how to get it out without killing one’s self or pissing-off everyone who reads it. That requires some patience, some practice. Even if what you’re writing about is warts. A good essay about warts will be both helpful, informative and cover it’s chosen ground well. Like this essay does.

No, it’s not exciting, gives no one further insight into the economic or political realm. It shows no woman how to traverse the current culture and be nominated for Vice-President, or elected Senator, or be chosen Secretary of State. Hell, it doesn’t even help one discover her own womanhood or find a path into Radical Feminism. But, it does read well, and it’s well-written. 

Thus, if writer’s block has you at it’s mercy: find another way. Be like water. Seek your level by whatever means necessary. If you cannot breakthrough, then break-around or break-under. Write and hone until you can at least have an essay to post about your writer’s block. 🙂

Or, you can do what I am about to do. Go steal something from yourself that you wrote a goodly while ago and post that up instead with a different title, or even the same one! Saves time and effort and if you liked the previous “stolen” thing. Well, get it out again. That will be here.

Sticks & Stones May Break My Bones

September 10, 2008

Dave Barnes
Sticks And Stones (lyrics)

You would have kept those words on your tongue,
If you had known the hurt they had done.
While your fists stay by, right by your side,
Your words they bruise me deep inside.  
I’d rather have sticks and stones and broken bones
than the words you say to me,
Cause I know bruises heal and cuts will seal 
but your words beat the life from me.

Sometimes your words are thick as lead,
You swing them strong upside my head.
But what hasn’t killed has made me strong,
So I’ll take my scars and move along.

I’d rather have sticks and stones and broken bones
than the words you say to me,
Cause I know bruises heal and cuts will seal 
but your words beat the life from me.

Goodbye is the best way that I know,
To forgive and still be letting go.

I’d rather have sticks and stones and broken bones
than the words you say to me,
Cause I know bruises heal and cuts will seal 
but your words beat the life from me.

I’ve been reading this morning a conversation started yesterday by the publication at Bilerico of an essay by Tobi Hill-Meyer about offensive language and how one might apply the words “tranny” and “she-male” or whether or not they should be applied at all. 

The comments are divided at this point. Some feel they shouldn’t use the word, some feel they should to “redeem” them and others appear to not have strong opinions one way or another. 

The blog has been copied onto a bulletin board forum I frequent and a discussion of the article has ensued there as well. Again, opinion divides on the BB as well as it has at Bilerico. People haven’t found agreement. Some are bothered, some are livid, others appear to find no problem.

I find a problem, simply I hate those two terms and I dislike slurs in particular. I see slurs as ways we use words to make “other” of people we engage with, either on the Web or in our lives. In fact, in both spaces I find their use generally to be employed when there are arguments. In most cases the argument reaches a point where tempers are high and someone uses “the word,” whatever it may be. The reason? No doubt to hurl something that will hurt or at least sting the recipient.

Humans do that a lot. We haven’t progressed much from the apes that learned to kill in 2001: A Space Odyssey.

Anyhow the discussions have gotten me to thinking and writing again. Do words hurt? Studies say they do. 

One of my interlocutors on the BB suggested that my dislike of the word “cunt” as well as the above two words mentioned was, perhaps, outta line. After all, he is a feminist and likes “cunt” much better than “vagina,” due to vagina’s Latin origin he discovered, and finds “bitch” (this is putting words in his mouth) complimentary, at least positive. Again, I disagreed. 

OK, he is a trans-man and probably spent a good long while in a community of lesbians. He lives in UK. He may have some social and cultural reasons not to have major problems with “cunt” and “bitch.” One might just say “you say va-gai-na, I say va-gee-na, let’s call the whole thing off.” Sorry, in this case my mind doesn’t work quite that way and I’ve been waiting and watching for the past two days for something that gets my writing started again. This looks like it was “it.”

What’s our deal with language? How do we determine what is slur, hate-speech, denigrating? Does it matter who is using what and how it’s used? For me “cunt” is not a word I have a special fondness for even after enjoying The Vagina Monologues and understanding the idea of “reclaiming and redeeming” words. But even that process among the reclaimers usually limits itself to the use of the slur only by members of the group formerly slurred by it. I mean, for instance, take this rendition of John McCain’s use of that word. It just doesn’t read right does it? 

When Bill O’Reilly uses “tranny” it doesn’t sound pretty at all and he certainly uses it in a derogatory fashion. If some Ku-Kluxer uses “nigger” it’s rather different, at least the thinking goes, than when P-Diddy uses it. If a transsexual uses “tranny” it’s way different than when O’Reilly uses it. If a lesbian chooses to call herself a “dyke” then that’s one thing, but if a male conservative preacher uses “dyke” in a hell-fire sermon in his pulpit then he almost certainly uses it offensively to any lesbians who might be present.

Reclaiming and redeeming are just fine with me. If, that is, such words can be reclaimed. While I’m at it though I have a question about all those words I’ve quoted above: she-male, tranny, nigger, dyke, cunt, bitch, while we’re at it let me toss in faggot since gay males have reclaimed it. How are they used and toward whom?

O crap, I’ve left out slur words for white, Anglo, Protestant, middle-class or upper-class, respectable males. Better remedy that oversight I suppose. Let me see Cracker? Bastard? Motherfucker? Son of a Bitch? WASP? Honkie? What else? Brit? Sassanach? 

That list just doesn’t make my “stun-meter” when I either write or say them; not the way at all that the others kinda made me feel just a bit guilty for writing them. So, as slurs go what’s the difference in all of those words? I mean aren’t they all used derogatorily? 

It strikes me that the major difference is that last list is aimed at dominants. The slurs that come at dominants don’t have quite the sting. In fact, in the cases of motherfucker, son of a bitch, bastard, the words themselves are aimed at women not at the males they are supposed to be aimed at. Bastard has to do with the chattel-state of the man’s mother at the time of his birth. Motherfucker, again, casts an aspersion on the man’s mother as being a child-molester of her own child.

Son of a Bitch shouldn’t be that difficult for anyone to figure-out. A slur at the woman behind the man. They are much like hen-pecked or cuckold. In fact that last may be the worst insult to a man I can think of: having his property, his wife, used by another man. It’s the only real possible attack on him in that entire lot of words. 

Honkie, Cracker, Sassanach, even dog don’t quite make it to that truly nasty state that anyone is going to seriously take them as slurs. So, just what gives here? Are we left with yanqui or yankee as the only decent insults for WASPs? I mean “wasp!!” … what the hell kind of insult is that? For that matter are yanqui or yankee insults? Not if you’re not living somewhere south of the Rio Grande River and have some actual knowledge of the way the United States has dominated your country. Or only if you are one of the Sons of the Confederacy. 

Do insults ever apply as a group to dominants? I rather think not, but if you can come up with one please leave it in a comment and I’ll be happy to discover one that I have been completely unable to find on my own. 

On the other hand in the midst of a conversation/argument on a panel discussion with a male panel-member if I were called “Cunt!” at some point does anyone doubt the audience would gasp? Also on the third hand, if I were to call him “Bastard” there might also be gasps.

I suspect they’d mostly come from the bad impression that some audiences might find with my using the word itself. After all, women of dignity don’t use such language. Well, of course we do; just some folks want ya to think we don’t. Some of us don’t really care what you think of our language, as long as you hear it and heed it. 

It seems to me in a very real and final way that slurs are only effectively directed at subordinates: all women, transsexual women as a sub-set, (are there any derogatory terms for transsexual males?) persons of color, (add wetback, mex, spic, rag-head, paki, wop, kike,) gay-males, lesbians, all people who are without the pale of “accepted” cultural categories in general, either historically or currently. 

The words themselves seem to me to be ways of profoundly othering another person. Slurs give us that moment when we drain the interlocutor or group of their humanity and make them as individuals and as a group less-than the humans we know ourselves to be.

In that way I think we can effectively decline the words she-male and tranny as well because they are used only in the context of a specific group of trans-people: transsexual females. The ultimate insult of the conservative and bigoted toward my history is that it somehow is not real. I am less-than because I was born with male gentialia.  

My interlocutor on the bulletin board has no good slur that affects him. (That is good, by the way, don’t start trying to make one!) Hell, his past is considered worthy: he has rejected the weak Feminine and, in spite of bodily difficulties that are, without doubt anymore, biological has overcome that inherent weakness and accepted the better Masculine. Hell, even many of my Feminist sisters would accept him among them in ways that they would refuse to accept me. The masculine, as Julia Serano has pointed out quite well, is the default normal and to be accepted, as the feminine is to be declined as much as possible. 

Slurs are the prerogative of dominance in all its forms: either perceived and conditioned or factual in terms of relative power. To align one’s self with the dominant is to be good. To align with subordination is to be less-than. 

As I said, I find slurs to be ways to drain another human of whatever distinct similarities they bear to ourselves. That’s the bottom line. 

In fact I’ve done Googles on the following she-male, tranny, cunt, nigger, bitch, faggot. Each of the first ten is linked with the words as I have written them. Just count the “negatives” that apply to each word’s “results” among the top ten searches and see what you find. Decide then whether or not redeeming is effective. 

Words are important and sticks and stones don’t leave anyone with injuries that cannot normally be healed in time if they are not fatal to begin with. Slurs on the other hand are very like scarlet letters that mark their recipient/s out as always less-than, without power-over or really much power of any kind, except the power that comes with exile and wandering through the human spectrum alone and looked down on.


Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started