Posted tagged ‘Friendship’

Letter To A Small God

March 12, 2010

I’ve a wonderful friend and soul-holder. His name is Tom and for the past few years we write occasional letters to one another, indulging ourselves in the rich rewards of bloviating and gentle alphabetical misspellings, exotic references and reminders that we have come to care for one another.

I cannot say that Tom is my best friend. I have never lived in close enough proximity to his light to actually shake his hand or hear his voice. We employ the post, postcards, emailed literary conceits and the silent recognitions of friendships from afar to communicate with one another. We’ve, thus far, eschewed the telephonic medium.

I haven’t found the least bit of concern in that. For, across the past few years I have come to hear the voice of this small god, Tom, in the confines of my heart. He remains there, enthroned as friend and companion extraordinare. He always has my gratitude for simply the fact that he is him. There can be, in my heart and mind, no better reason for a bit of worship for another human being. Their very human beingness is quite enough, thanks so very much.

Tom wrote me today. I replied. Then, somewhere about midway through my reply, I thought to cut and paste the correspondence here, so as to share it with some of you. Hopefully, you’ll smile. Perhaps, at least some of you will consider the letters as something worth the reading.

Whatever your case, mine is simply that I love Tom and appreciate, more than I do most things, having met him in any way, ever.

____________________________________________

Somehow we missed this series of exchanges and just re-read them since we have a new expanded email system on our Island of Escapism.  We hope you continue to be well! We do guh-no just how hard it can be up against the Philistines and the Chosen folk. Really most of them would benefit from scrabbling about on this planet as small box turtles for awhile so they might truly appreciate standing on two legs.

We have been diligently embracing our acreage, garden, and eight chickens who deliver a bounty of eggs.  Of course we spoil them with sardines, hamburger, table scraps, and wild ranging during sun up times.  We also play the talk shows loud when we’re away and this keeps (LOL) the Coons and Fox at bay – maybe?

Chickens are truly delightful pets – productive layers – and eventually great shepherd’s pie fillers.  They also provide an amazing quantity of poop mixed with straw for the garden. Why didn’t we do this earlier?  Always the best of questions.

We took Connie to Portland for her 75th B’day and indulged in some amazing lunch escapades as well slap and tickle each morning – though the thinning of membranes, the bolted neck, and the two replaced knees have reduced the sporting life to a careful study of the more exotic and manual Sutras of which we’re reasonably sure a small deity of your calibre will be aware.

We are now offishully her small god and she ours.  We hold hands a lot – and she has taken to grabbing our ass in public which we find very sweet.

Just think, we are now on the verge of 70 – yup May 25th – “Oh you’re one of those May Geminis – that explains a lot.”  Don’t you just hate that kind of astrological sophistry?  Esp. when it may coincidentally make some kind of ethereal sense?

So dear sweet lovely wonderful, and joyous Radha  – don’ be a strannnn jjjer but send us at least an update on your small deity  positions.

Love you as always, with sincerity,

Tom

_________________________________________________

Dearest Tom and most favorite small god of a very tiny goddess,

I find that I miss you, and most other forms of communications, lately. Clients, and the sharing of a work computer with my excellent and most favored office-mate limit my writing time at work. (I really do adore her, but she and I have both had problems lately that seem to prevent our ever actually being at work to get done the thingies we need to do on the computer! Consequently, I do what I can and try to leave more time for her, but she is lately often out with a lengthy family emergency and has near run herself into the ground with her energetic care for others and running than doing her paperwork.) Thus, it’s tough to get aught written there.

Home? We shall simply say of home that adolescent homework assignments preclude use of the computer here on most days until the creative juices have dried and become a crust across the edges of my mind.

Then home, ah, home. The heart is here but the flesh of my just-turned-12-yesterday son is weak. Today a marker injudiciously hurled at another by yet another managed to hit said son in the eye. At the end of my probationary period I have missed four days of work due simply to him.

Three days were caused by a threatened suicide accompanied with something more than ideation as he inflicted scratches on his wrist. Said scratches went across and not up and down, but visible they were as an abrasion.

At least he came and spoke with his tiny goddess mother who, while attempting to find him therapeutic help, was told by the inevitable insurance rip-offs to take him to the emergency room. (Odd, no, how said insurance thieves consistently chatter away about how expensive e-rooms are and how they try to keep us out of them with their grave and steady diligence all the while shipping us to said expensive treatments as a matter of course?)

Yep, first chance they get they shunt one toward that very expensive treatment intervention where one seems to be inevitably sent to a psych ward due to some doctor who doesn’t want to admit that he’s petrified of being sued should said child go ahead with his plan and stand before a train to be dismembered and ground to bloody and offensive pulp and not to continue to live in a society that is friendly only to the demon Mammon, and becomes decidedly more inimical to any human kindness and relationship as time moves inexorably somewhere or another.

Perhaps that large Goddess, Mother, could intervene with me and show me a better way to teach others to live, at the least, with some sense of actual community, rather than the vague conglomerations of “helping communities” — in which I vote as a therapist at an inner city mental health clinic — “apartment communities” — beyond belief that we even use the term, how more alienated can anyone be than to have living around you 800 people who come and go somewhat faster than the summer leaves on the trees?

And “business communities” — what utter bullshite!

The very idea that any of those porkers are looking for anything but the main chance to shiv another and remove all the other’s worldly goods to the their own bank balances stands to unreason as far as the mind of man runneth not to the contrary! Instead, perhaps there might be some way to understand among both washed and unwashed that the Ayn-Randian capitalist ideal of a serial killer kind of greatness where the strong, socially abhorring and stout sociopathic I-N-D-I-V-I-D-U-A-L, man-alone, man-needing-no-one-but-himself-for-anything can be seen instead as man-the soft-and-malleable, man-the-weak-and-totally-in-thrall-to-others-because-he-is-man-THE-SOCIAL-ANIMAL-who-cannot-clean-even-his-own-ass-nor-feed-himself-the-most-squishy-tasteless-and-viscuous-pablum-at-birth-and-for-long-after-without-the-aid-of-at-least-someone-else-and-who-even-in-his-brawny-Alan-Greenspan/Tom-DeLay-Lloyd-Blankfein-John-Boehner-Glenn-Beck-obese-Rush-Limbaugh-state still requires interaction with others to offer him water, meals, whiteboards, votes, under-the-table contributions, electoral strength, gas, for his car (not for his insufferable babble about standing strong alone and needful of nothing but marks to bleed dry and then discard,) fuck bunnies: to saté his enormous appetite for anyone but himself to play with, visions of the grandest grandeur as himself striding the world, colossus of colossal and epic proportions in “the world” safely limited to the delusions he feeds himself so that his meager and weak ego can find the strength to actually come out and bully others while regaling himself with doing god’s own work is the height of inestimable regard in our society, regardless the platitudes the most expensive whores spout at us.

I wonder at the moronic ineptitude that takes balding and pathetically suited, lavender-tied hubris to a level that it cannot be imagined that even the baroque Louis XIV or the screaming and petulant Achilles or daughter-raping Agamemnon reached in anything but their most wildly erotic and hallucinogenic dreams.

Sad, but true, luv, I am so angry that I’m not even angry anymore. Instead I would wish that my laughter might ring like Mother’s voice in the ears of those pathetically limp-dicked monstrosities of human beings until the last vestiges of already tattered and decrepit ego explode inside their shriveled and base hearts. Five minutes of goddessly laughter in their idiot heads would be enough, I reckon, to rid us of the entire slope-headed, little-boy daydreaming greatness and super-strength bullshit they pump themselves with. In a poof it would burn to molecules unseen like the flimsiest flash-paper.

O wad Her Power the giftie gie us, to see oursels as ithers see us! More so, to see what they really think and want to do to our preening self-absorbed American insanity, I imagine the blanching lasting for a while.

That would be a task best left to the fawning and mincing pens and microphones of “journalists” who serve the pleasure of those larded-assed idiots while being paid ultimate whores-wages by the simpering and ruddy-faced simpletonian platitudes of the Rupert Murdochs of the world. Ah, but they are comfortable in their various prostitutions and prolly one would wait centuries till even one of their insipid voices were raised against their johns’ wishes.

Ah, dearest friend and worshipper/worshipped small god, I envy you your chickens and your shepherd’s pies (although, methinks, that they’d be best termed cooper-pies or some such, unless you replace the avian meat with the flesh of fleecy lambs whose throats sometimes undergo the steel blade of a knife and a swift cutting and trimming so that the meat baked into the pie would be coherent with the title of the finished dish.) Do you suppose that cowboys or gauchos make pies of beef?

At any rate I had to leave behind the job I love today to attend to the silly pre-teen wounding of my son whose eye appears to have abruptly halted the flight of a whiteboard marker hurled by a second boy at a third. *sigh* I’m sure the thrower will be dreaming of following in the footsteps of the above-mentioned Glenn Beck someday. Hopefully, the poor child will choose a higher calling, at least that of rag-picker in some Philly slum like Kensington and not pursuing the extremely demeaning and prostitutional calling of a Glenn Beck.

I wonder at the efficacy of the teaching of the masters of this small god realm in which we live, dearest Tom. When I went to school in this age they attempted to impart to us Civics lessons. Now the impartures seem to be how best to grind one’s brain to a consistent mush and one’s soul into particle board for the tables laid with meaningless and often lying reports of financial doings at places that formerly existed – Lehman Brothers, to wit. Why does it come as no surprise, I ask this tiny goddess self, that the thieves thieve and become liars to cover the thieving? O, yes, I do know the answer to that! America has no soul worth the labelling of that high name.

Working, as I have, for a very long time among people whose mental balance has been deemed unbalanced in an east coast inner city I find that I have seen such scenarios played out on sidewalks, by dumpsters, and even, ’tis true, in the halls of my workplaces. No need to go to the palatial glass and steel vaulting penis buildings along Wall Street or in other boringly-the-same towering cathedrals of evil to see that the business of capitalism is theft: the bigger, the better, and more to be gloried in and about. Our Puritan ancestry taught us well that a sucker is born minutely and that gods are on the side of the most audacious and irredeemable thieves and liars in a society that prides itself on upright and pious facades.

‘Tis most awesome, though, how well we imbibe such pablum-mixing conduct (most of all) through the agencies of our various and proud monotheistic, materially-centric religious institutions: The Church in Rome, The Southern Baptist Conventicle, Melodious Methodists and Preening Presbyterians, Lurid Lutherans, and the hydra-headed and regenerating as though Leporidean, Evangelicals of way too many names to gather them all in one essay.

Their Hell is reserved for those who have sex (most especially those who do so out of the bonds of some priest/minister-inducted Droit de Seigneur celebration where the bride has been used and abused by the various officials or perhaps, usually, ’twas the groom so abused and used) for the simple love of another, though it sometimes be but briefly, while when one has it with a child or a man or woman they have taken in thrall to their vested power it becomes somehow worthy and to be hidden proudly if not openly praised openly. The wink-wink, nod-nod paean to bad conduct is their most effective teaching tool: “We never knew; and are truly sorry. Please, send more money, quickly so we might continue our very needful work of stealing from those who have little to steal!”

There is an insipid mundaneity about the entire mass of preachers, priests, salesmen and saleswomen, shills and barkers after paper fortune that simply infuriates one when she contemplates how fatuously unheroic and abject they all are. A plague on their houses would be incredibly overblown as punishment. A seeping pustule on their asses would be more appropriate: pustules for the pustules.

Both, bride and groom, so-indoctrinated, are then commended to the “father” god for safe-keeping while being made into the most abject shills whose sexual desire is forbidden them except in cases where they desire to breed a few more morsels of young flesh for the pleasure of said officiators who can, thus, begin again the “work of god.”

Forbid it that showing even the basest modicum of care or compassion not deeply immured within the confines of pious platitude and know-nothing and moronic showmanship be taught our children in this lush desert of anything worth actually having, save one another. Thus, my son spent a week in the hospital while others attended to his perfectly sane wish to slay himself at the thought of growing to adulthood in this living hell we manage to jokingly refer to as a society.

The longer I work in mental health the more convinced I become that the British shrink, R.D. Laing, was indubitably correct when he opined that it seemed to him that schizophrenia was a perfectly reasonable way for one to adjust herself to a perfectly insane social order and society. One would evoke the powers of some Grand God of Sociopathy (could a god be named Lloyd?) to grant one the ability to play and screw unfeelingly and unstintingly every one with whom one comes into contact. Is it a wonder that Charlie Colson became a minister after averring that he’d walk over his grandmother for Richard Nixon? Somehow in the Age of the Sociopath the evil of Colson merely appears laughable and cute these days.

It’s enough, dearest Tom, to chivvy one’s self toward the pleasures of the most Lethe-like narcotics and alcohol washes. Despair never seems far from the door. Yet, I suspect that a flock of chickens, or a flock of lambs, gambolling or clucking outside one’s door while she tends a garden of chickpeas and lentils, tomatoes, spuds, lettuces, carrots, radishes, cucumbers, onions, peppers and tall pampas grasses might go far to pleasantly isolate one’s self from the grating insincerity and indescribable hubris of our most-modern and effluent societal norms.

Alas, the tiny goddess but shakes the dust off her feet and the curdled soil off her garden-trowel and drops seeds into the earth. In her work time she attempts to drop other seeds, those of community and well-being, into the hearts of her charges, who offer her better companionship and society than could ever be found anywhere, but on the heating grates, along Wall Street. I’d rather trust the kindness of those bereft of hope than the riches of those whose stink rises into the great akasha between here and Ouranos.

I do not know if you’ve deigned to avail yourself of the various links I seem to always post these days on that damnable Facebook account (there’s a certain folly, no, in attempting community from 3000 miles away?) But I’d recommend the cultured and suave scribblings of someone who recalls to me my latest upbringing in the wilds of eastern Tennessee. He was apparently raised and lives for around six months a year in the northern edges of Virginia’s Shenandoah Valley, the other six in some expatriate enclave in Ajijic, Mexico. Yet, even from the distance I find myself sometimes ensorcelled by his words. Joe Bageant is well worth the read if one wishes to see a jaundiced but good-hearted view of the state of America. He has the value of being down-home and genteel, yet erudite in a sort of backwoods farmer kinda way. The essays are somewhat reminiscent of a hillbilly Dorothy Parker or a southern H.L. Mencken. They contain much wisdom and a good deal of laughter and recognition.

The tiny goddess needs must leave off this letter to you, my very dear friend. She has an errand to run to the doctor’s with a child whose eye was struck unexpectedly with a whiteboard marker missile.

You are ever in my heart, Tom. As always give my very best and a hug for me to Connie. I understand that only the best of human stock can long-endure the hearts of we miniscule deities. I shouldn’t wish it to be a thankless task, so give her my thanks that she’s held you for long enough that I have come to know, revere, and appreciate, most delicately, thee.

Radha

Love, Connection, Exile and Human Possibility

October 29, 2008

There are days that everything can just feel really quite good.  Then that day may be followed the next day by a day that seems destined to be “off” from the very start. I suppose today is the latter and yesterday was the former. 

Catherine and I got to bed reasonably early last night and both had an excellent sleep. This morning I went down and started the coffee. She was running late and declined breakfast but I made her a lunch. She roused Ian on her way down and he and the dog came rocketing downstairs within a few minutes. 

Meantime she had to leave for work. I walked with her out to her car and we said our goodbyes in what looks more and more like a mid-winter day on the East Coast: very grey-blue deeply embedded clouds and a mostly brisk wind that stirs the cool (currently 47F which is predicted as the day’s high temp) air mass that arrived yesterday with rain, snow and hail mixed and then changed to unrelenting rain. It was a cold goodbye. 

Immediately I returned in and Ian was upset at me for not having come in two minutes before when he’d interrupted our “goodbye ritual.” When I returned he refused to respond to me. *sigh* Within a few minutes, after I had done what he had requested, it was time for him to walk down to catch the school bus and off he went: no goodbye hug and peck as is the usual morning goodbye. A stern face to top it all with. 

The phone rang and I knew it was Catherine. She’d had a flat on the Interstate a couple of miles downroad toward Princeton. I knew better than to cause Ian worry so I didn’t just jump in the car and head down to help her.

Instead, I insisted he return and we did the ritual, his limp arms tensing and relaxing as he hugged me. So I pulled him tighter and hugged him harder and then tousled his blond head and told him, “I love you more than my own life.” Finally! A smile and then a “real” hug from my child.

Immediately he was gone the phone rang again. Catherine. She had told me during the earlier call that the place she had pulled over was fairly narrow and the cars were whizzing past during rush-hour at tremendous rates of speed. Now she told me she had moved up about ten yards where the shoulder was wider.

“How do you take off the wheel cover?” — Just the kinda question I am equipped to handle. “Well, you get the bent thingy and kinda just gently pry it up around the edge, I think.” — See what I mean? Car mechanics have always been a foreign country for me. I do well to get the gasoline into the tank at a service station. Another good reason to go to Jersey for gas as the law there requires pump attendants to do that. 

Then from the phone, “There’s a car, o my God ….” Dead air. O, Goddess! Suddenly I was hysteric and knew I was bereft. One of those speeding cars had plowed into her car and slain my love on the roadside during rush-hour. 

I was frantic. I cried. I tried to call her cell again and again. I tried information to call the NJ State Police. The number I used didn’t go through. I was totally frantic. The phone rang.

Laughing and O-so-calm and bright on the other end: “O, hi. (you know the sound.) Someone stopped to help me. He’s changing the tire.” 

“Are you alright! O my god, I thought you were dead.”

“Well, I was trying to call you back, but the phone was busy and wouldn’t seem to ring over into call-waiting. What’s the matter.”

Sobbing: “I thought you were dead. I was trying to call the State Police to get you some help. I didn’t know what to do! The info number wouldn’t work or I dialed it wrong. I have been beside myself for the past four minutes!” 

“O, honey, I’m so sorry. He walked up to the car while I was leaning inside and I saw the car stop, but didn’t see him coming. He just scared me and I disconnected. I’m fine he’s changing the tire for me. I’m gonna get it fixed because we can’t drive to Massachusetts for the wedding this weekend on a donut.

“So can you jump in your car and meet me at Pep Boys? Maybe we can walk over to IHOP and get breakfast together.”

” Just let me get my breath. You cannot imagine how devasted I have been.” Still sobbing into the phone.

“I’m fine. Can you please meet me?”

“Yes, just let me toss on some flats and feed and walk the dog and I’ll be right there.”

“OK, I love you.”

“O, Mother! I love you as well. I thought I had lost you forever.” Click

I drove, the long way having forgotten the detour at Edgewood, and finally found her at the IHOP. We had breakfast, went to Barnes & Noble and had another coffee while waiting on Pep Boys to do an oil-change and replace the tire. Then, in separate cars we came home. It was 1 p.m. 

Now just bear with me. I’m getting to the point. 

I exchanged long messages with my friend Ilsa last night. We talked about the L-word. No, not that L-word, Love

She: No, love is not a bad thing. I don’t think. It has many dimensions. I am sure it is often mis-used where what people really mean is I like this or that a lot, or I want to have sex with you, but they don’t really mean love as I understand it. Right away I am incorrect because I don’t understand it, at least not well.

Me:  I just wonder — so why are we so reticent? It’s not as though we don’t each require all the interactions you mentioned and then a few that you prolly didn’t. Friendship. You broke down “this medium” and our feelings for another through it so very well. 

She: It has to be OK to love. Don’t ya think?

It doesn’t mean we need to undermine our primary relationships with it. It just means that we expect something from someone else. We might share some things with others we love. We might expect some semblance of safety, or comfort in contact with others.

I mean to say – “I love you” to someone you have not met and only correspond with over this medium seems odd at first. But love has many forms. It can be a sense of value for ideas, another’s experience, humor, thought processes. 

I think the idea of love can be uncomfortable as a concept because of the expectations that can accompany it. In fact, I have often endorsed the idea that love is only expectation.

I really don’t hang on all over the folks that sail with me and drippingly say, “I love youuuuu”. That would be really odd. …  as friends with those folks we have bonded in shared experiences and reliance on each other that seems to be best described as love. But could also be described, analyzed, as expectation.

Me: Thank you. And yes, I find myself coming through these pixels, in some very nice way, loving you. *hugs*

Just what is it we do seek? For we do, do we not, seek something more in Internet and physical meetings and friendships? What drive is there in us for connection, for the reality of another with whom we begin to feel kinship in some way? What loneliness must we soothe? What groping toward community do we seek? Why when we are alone do we simply feel, most of the time, uncomfortably bereft?

The easy answer is that connection is part of our deepest make-up. Like it or not we have descended from a kind of Miocene Ape. We are the offspring of a creature who left the trees for the savannah, probably during a time of climate change, to make a way of life more adaptable to living on and passing along its genes to it’s children down through the ages until, finally, that next set of children became homo sapiens.

It’s an easy story. But, we also know from our nearest relations left alive, chimpanzees and gorillas, that society and connection are very much a part of the make-up of both ourselves and that breed of Miocene Apes that were our ancestors. They had learned, in some fashion, community. That fashion, I suspect, goes much further back than a few million years ago when a pair and their offspring walked along the lakeshore at Laetoli and left behind as fossils their footprints.  

The drawing on your right shows only the three, father, mother, and child held by mom, walking through an arid landscape, inhabited by myriads of herd-animals and birds, a kind of nuclear family from four million years ago.

The picture is accurate in some regards. We have no surety of knowledge that it was only this one family on the move. They, as well, might have been part of a larger herd whose footprints were not impressed and preserved through the randomness of natural occurrence. Besides, given the sort of Ayn-Randesque individual and immediate-family motifs our culture dotes on, what better idea would the painter have found, immediately? The nuclear family suspended in imagination through the ages, all the way back to our earliest historic existences.

Our definitions are surely products of our culture and our conditionings. We imagine that “things have always been this way.” But, the fact remains that the Miocene Apes like australopithecus afarensis, or the imagined early man who’s conjectured to possibly have been alive at that time, were communal creatures. They were given to social interactions for their very survival. They were definitely not “rugged individualists,” for had they been then I would not be writing this essay and you would not be reading it.

The “rugged individualists” of that age mostly died I would suspect: eaten by lions, leopards, or cave bears, not strong or fierce enough to withstand the terrible power of top-predators. Thus, our ancestors were communal and that communal nature they passed along to us as a means for survival. Not simply for the survival of the strongest male or female of the clan, but for the survival of the clan and the species.

Human beings thrive in community and communion. Alone and alienated we wither. Do you need proof?  In the tale of Emperor Frederick II Hohenstauffen it’s said that Frederick demanded that some infants be raised without human contact to see, when they began to speak, if the would speak Hebrew, God’s language. The nurse-maids and other attendants were forced to not hold or interact with the babies, all of whom died before they ever reached an age to speak. Deprivation of human contact leads to “failure to thrive” in infants. In adults it leads to alienation and death by attrition over time.   

Love, in that fashion, becomes imperative for human beings. We thrive with romantic love, love of siblings and parents, love for friends and co-workers. Is it any wonder that the bonds of love and fellowship can grow through the Internet? For, as so many of us know, the bonds of friendship and companionship might be less firm in our technological-industrial societies than in any previous societies we have made. So much work, so little time for relationship. So much mental and physical illness, so much anomie and exile. 

The psychiatrist, Jean Baker Miller asserted connection as the paramount quality of all human existence, more important for people thriving than any other one aspect of our lives. Our lives tend to bear that out. We think better in connection, running our thoughts and our hopes through the other for editing and expansion. We tend to love closeness, even in our alienated lives. With connection, we find, there comes a desire for more connection, more friends, more confidantes, more interaction with others. We do not live well when we are disconnected.

Thus, my friend Ilsa has become important to me. I find her words ring true so often that I seek her input when I have a problem. The same is true about my interactions with both of my friends named Robin, Yvette and Phyllis, Jen, Shay, Jenn, Sarah, Karen, Teresa, David, Donald, Danielle, Joanna, Jeanne-Marie, Natalie, Jeanette, Nat, Annie, Lexie, Abby, Kate, and of my deepest love, Catherine.

Those people and others bind me deeply to myself and to the human contact, both in my physical and Web life, that I need and that helps me thrive. Without their solace and their companionship, without their winnowing of my desires and thoughts I would stand bereft of much good sense and probably do many more things I would later regret later than I already do. 

For the past two days I have engaged in a discussion turned rather much nasty with a number of people on the web about the news of the weekend of the new Australian/American discovery of an androgen-receptor that appears extended in a significantly different percentage of transsexual-historied people than in a population of non-transsexual people. 

The aim of the discussion appeared at the very beginning to be an avenue for one person to trumpet a false fact — that the study made a statement of validity and recognition for a group she wishes to call “classic transsexuals.” I’ve written before about a segment of women with transsexing histories who appear to be dead-on set to claim validity for themselves while claiming invalidity for anyone who disagrees with them.

My personal take on the entire matter is much like what Nica, Shay and MgS commented about on my essay of yesterday. One’s realness cannot and will not be affirmed or negated by a scientific study. To make the attempt is to enter a realm of interaction and self-deception that cries out to the person who does so to examine herself and find her validity within herself, not in demeaning and in dismissing others.

The destruction of, or disregarding of, human capacity and possibility in others makes me nothing more than I am already. In fact, it makes me, inevitably, less than I am. If I remove from the world those who disagree or differ from me in some way than I shall surely be alone when the other 6 billion are gone. My search for more validity and “realness” can only come in community, sister- and brotherhood with others so much like me that I cannot tell a difference when I examine them, speak to them, interact with them. 

Ideology, the quest to be “right” or “correct” is nothing more, to my mind, than a wish for alienation, frustration, and eventually death alone without another’s touch or care. It cannot make me “whole” to be “right.” Rightness over all else only makes me alone and lonely, angry and believing that everyone else rejects me.

No person is an island. How long shall we be willing to assume, since John Donne is dead, that his words are no longer true and we can make our way alone through the world and thrive? How long shall we be willing and even gleeful in dismissing others as being “other” than me and, so, unworthy to be thought of as just as important, in just as much need of social acceptance and individual acceptance? 

Yes, we can all choose our friends. We make choices about lovers and acquaintanceships. What we cannot make is the choice to be totally alone and at the same time to thrive and grow, feel positively and act in ways that assert the ongoing value of human community. Exile is death as the Greeks and the Italians felt when dismissed from the polis. The same truth appears to be evident among religious groups who shun or place outside the pale their members who violate some rule of community.

As Ilsa said: It has to be OK to love. Don’t ya think? 

Yes, I think it does. In fact, I think it’s something we must do or we shall pass from this earth, unmarked.

All of the valuable qualities … like helping in the development of others—will not get you to the top at General Motors, were that path open to women…. The characteristics most highly developed in women and perhaps most essential to human beings are the very characteristics that are specifically dysfunctional for success in the world as it is…. They may, however, be the important ones for making the world different.– Jean Baker Miller
 

Mystery: For Lexie, Les, Shay, Danielle, Zythyra, Tree, Jenn & Others Not Yet Named

October 10, 2008

My blogs this week seem to have revolved around love, at least I think of them as being about love. One learns to love one’s self. One learns to love those close to one’s self. One learns to love those who have never been close, but in some way become close. Our ideas, our lives partake of such different substance and events, one might wonder, as I do, what’s the tie? What brings me to this love for those I only know through a call, a set of posts on a bulletin board, hurried meetings at a conference or in a setting that doesn’t lend itself to forming attachment, relationship? 

I think when we find truth it is somewhat like finding something one doesn’t expect.

Two summers ago we were at Cutler Coast in Maine. We wandered through the piney woods and out to the headlands. Magnificent!

On a huge and towering rock I found something like truth. It was the shell of a sea anemone, empty and dry about six feet down on the rock in a very tiny ledge. It just sat there.

I strained to reach it as nausea from my vertigo swept over me. I was scared to death; and, yet, said not a word to either my strapping teenaged son nor to my less-than-strapping partner. Instead, like an idiot, I grasped a thin and gnarled pine as the winds swept over us and let myself down far enough to reach with one straining hand to grasp the shell.

And did! Then called out so my son would haul me back.

Goddess! I was trembling. Yet, to find that the shell was in my hand at the top, to hold it, seemed to me like a success of a higher order than most things I’ve accomplished in life.

It was as if there had balanced some deep and significant truth on that tiny ledge. Now I had it in my hand back on the solid and flat rock.

I remember him shaking his head in puzzlement. “Mom, whydjadothat!! For a freaking shell!! Ya coudakiltyrself!!”

Well, yes. I suppose I might have. But he was there; and the shell is on the mantle now. When I look at it I still see those headlands, relive some of that magic eight days. I think of some of my friends that way, like anemones balanced on the ledge of a rock towering above the ceaseless ocean. They hang precarious as crystal suspended beneath a hammer hanging by a silk thread. 

What touch will be right? What nuance of word and thought, of feeling will arrive at its destination through the agency of light waves, receivers and transmitters, my adeptness at conveying my thoughts and feelings, theirs at reading and understanding? 

It all seems as fragile as an anemone shell two hundred feet above rocks in a stiff wind on the Maine coast. If I grasp the shell, the crystal, and pull it toward me will it break, turning to dust and chalk in my hand? Will I slip, reaching too far to keep my balance and come crashing, body and shell, stem-glass, to the jutting rock beneath?

Does one hide in these pixels, in the insubstantial communication of words, imperfectly through the visual medium of IM and posts? How strong are letters? How flexible and substantial can a vocabulary be, and how much of either shares itself between two distant minds?  

In fragility arises strength, I think. There are times when one can grasp, through words and letters the sense of another, whether to trust one’s heart and hope to that other far away. Or perhaps, to withhold the deepest modicum of trust, knowing that one doesn’t know, perhaps never shall, the strength of the connection between two minds, two hearts, palpable to the touch, but unknown in the interplay of written words carried on light beams. 

Thus, some of my deepest connections are with those I have come to love on this Internet. Some have become allies, others I simply feel a deep connection with as I read their words, trusting them with small pieces of my heart.

There have been cases where the trust was misplaced, or that I chose to give trust, but not all of it, hesitant that a revelation might shatter a tenuous bond I would have rather kept whole. But hiding can become a tiresome game for one who’s played it so very long, so very well, that it’s become first nature to withhold pieces of oneself from relationship. 

I’d rather seek the pathways of the wind and feel the air whistle in my ears, part my hair and send it cascading across my shoulders and down my back. I would rather spread my arms to embrace than to hold them across my chest as a protection. Thus, one takes a risk, reveals what she knows perhaps will make the largest difference: I am poor. I cannot shop at Nordstrom. I am over fifty. I was once transsexual. I was raised in the South. I have children and a partner. I dreamt of my angry son being slain by a man and I called fire from the sky to slay the slayer.  

Who can auger the omens so well that she will not sometimes find the glass broken and her palm flayed open and bleeding? What human heart and mind can encompass the crannies and hidden parts of the other where dragons dwell concealed in caverns of self-consciousness? To step into the glittering array of stalagmites and stalactites might be to find one’s self impaled, struggling for breath as her life drips away onto a limestone floor.

Connection, live connection, electronic connection, forever entails risk. To open the heart invites the possibility of scars and pain, of rejection as well as the open arms and care that another might give her. It’s always a risk, always. My question simply comes to this: “do you wish to remain where you were?”  

I’ve found over the past seven years that I do not wish to remain where I was. There is safety, perhaps, in concealment, but I find that, for myself, to be the safety of the tomb. Had we but world enough, and time, this coyness, Lady, were no crime.  Like Marvell I haven’t the time. The risk seems worth the taking. Although hurt arises from some risks, from other risks there arises great delight. 

It strikes me as odd, however, this fact that when I feel a need to withhold I should honor it. Sometimes intuition deserves a hearing and a heeding. One can read omens in the printed word, as my friend, paraphrased, has said, the quality of the reader can lead to discernment.

Thus, I’ve found myself withholding things in order to maintain relationship and have found in unfolding revelation I had been perceptive to begin with. Web friendships shatter like anemone shells and leave one grasping dust. Yet, so do material friendships where one exchanges hugs and hears a voice as she watches a mouth form words. Actually, there’s not a lot of difference.   

Of course there are those friendships that partake of both realms: web and human meeting. They begin in one realm and pass into another due to circumstance and movement. Change forever enfolds us and to struggle against the distance can be a very passionate and fulfilling act. To maintain what once was maintained with letters or simply thoughts that brought back life as though it were being lived again calls from us a depth of humanity and self that always seems worth its cost. 

So I offer this paean to some few whom I shall hold in my heart, strive to touch in my life, and shall continue to build friendship with though I must risk standing on a ledge no wider than the diameter of an anemone shell and hold, desperately, to gnarled and precarious roots of a pine rooted in crevices of rock. They’ve proven themselves worth the risk of my effort, worth the opening of my heart, worth the places I have opened to them, for they have protected the trust, made whole and solid the ground on which I stand. 

A mystery?

O, yes.

But, Mystery is possible although it cannot be described.

The grave’s a fine and private place,
But none I think do there embrace.

        Now therefore, while the youthful hue
Sits on thy skin like morning dew,
And while thy willing soul transpires
At every pore with instant fires,
Now let us sport us while we may;
And now, like am’rous birds of prey,
Rather at once our time devour,
Than languish in his slow-chapp’d power.
Let us roll all our strength, and all
Our sweetness, up into one ball;
And tear our pleasures with rough strife
Through the iron gates of life.
Thus, though we cannot make our sun
Stand still, yet we will make him run. 

 

 

Salons and Saloons: The Quirkiness of Living and Loving

October 2, 2008

It would be nice to place a list here. It might, no would, be a list of where I’ve been, what I have done and what’s been done to me. It would be nice if that list might somehow guide me and others through a shoal of problems, steer us unscathed past the reefs of ignorance, trial and error.

But, I don’t think I am capable of that. Certainly not now, there’s simply too much to write, and so little time. No matter how much experience I gather, it seems that more waits for reaping. How little I truly know.

Yesterday I knew less. Knew that the world looked bleak as the rain had been hanging about for five days. The clouds simply seemed to have closed over this place as though they’d hold it and hide it from all the rest of the world. I felt alone and sad. Yes, even therapists have days like that. Especially those of us with depressive disorders as well. 

I couldn’t make words flow together. I sat at this keyboard for hours trying to find the least clue about how to start, hoping that just the start itself, as it often does, would lead to a middle and a conclusion. I was hoping for some sort of insight that never quite surfaced in my consciousness. The more I searched for it, the further away it seemed to shift.

I felt empty. My thoughts sank to places and feelings I would rather not have experienced again. I could feel depression approach. Like any old friend we have a deep and lasting relationship with, I could feel him nearing my heart. Soon he would knock and gain entrance, for I was simply not able, I thought, to turn him away.

But, there are times when life intervenes in some rare coincidence that changes everything. Life grants a chance and one must be willing to grasp that chance. What would be worse? To miss it and continue on the same downward pathway? Or to take the chance and at least postpone one’s descent?

So, it happened. A friend I had been thinking about, but who had never “talked” to me on IM, beckoned. The pop-up screen startled me. I had to look twice to realize what had occurred: the chance of actually having my IM page activated at that time was close enough to destiny that I look at the event today and imagine some inevitable force beyond me had made it so.

I replied. Two hours later I found myself giggling and laughing outloud with the sly wit and the nearness, so it seemed, of that other. They knocked before Depression and, when he did knock, I was elsewhere in my house, being regaled with witticisms and chatting about American politics, the California wine-country and bicycling. I never heard Depression’s raps on the door to my heart. 

As I look back on that life-saving IM I realize that my friend did something extraordinarily wise and careful. I was allowed to go on about how miserable and worthless I felt in that moment. How much I wanted life to somehow enter me from the outside and fill me like one might fill their car with the energy to continue driving. I moaned. I whined. I revisted some of the darkest times of my life.

From the other side of the continent there was… acceptance? The occasional deflection such as: “Aw, I don’t find that true of you. I find a lot of substance there, someone I enjoy.” But, overall there was this constant turning of the conversation to humor, while at the same time allowing me to express my growing sense of worthlessness and longing, until I finally made the wish to them that I would love a salon, a grand one, like those of La Pompadour, Jeanne Du Barry or Gertrude Stein. Scintillating conversation and laughter, grand ideas and beautiful music and poetry. Life was welling up in me; I hadn’t noticed.

The rejoinder was “or a saloon?”  I laughed and didn’t stop after that until they were no longer on the screen. Yes, a saloon would have been as good as a salon. Anywhere where warm bodies and quick minds reminded me that life is good and that friends and lovers are much too dear to allow one to heed the knocking of cold Depression would have, did, change my life.  

I could have almost fallen in love again when I realized at the end of that two hours that I was better, much better, than I had been before that pop-up appeared. I was laughing, even though the clouds and rain were still here, outside though, no longer inside and outside 

I think that I maybe know where I am today. The clouds have given way to a bright and shining sunlight, a crisp wind from the northwest, and a freshness and vitality that braces the very air of this small village. But more, I feel life. Not some life pumped into me as I lay passively, filling me from outside in; I feel a life that bursts up from my deepest heart.

Looking from this window beside which I type I have a desire to be done with writing today. I shall shower and dress and go out there. I shall go and discover the salon, or the saloon, where the wonders of the world and Life itself beckon to me like old friends gathered for a party at which I am the guest of honor. I can imagine, today, sitting very still in this wind and watching the leaves, imperceptibly most of the time, but today visibly, change color from green to red, yellow, orange.

Even in life’s departure there is life. Even at the edge of depression one can discover, within herself, without herself, a flower of care and love, a summons to life.

 

There are days I awaken thinking life is dull and find that somewhere along the path that day I have gotten lost. The landmarks that seemed so clear when I rolled from my tousled sheets and rubbed my eyes of sleep somehow disappeared. It’s as if the very landscape had changed. I walk in some weird world like Tormance in David Lindsay’s allegory.

Nothing is simple, I think. The complexity and richness of life leaves me often puzzled as to where and how I should travel. Perhaps this blog will be able to record some of what I have seen and done. Perhaps it might help someone, although I imagine that anyone reading it will take my experience and my attempt to make sense of it and apply that to a very different life. Perhaps no one, except myself will gather from it much at all.

Today: contemplative and a bit humbled. But alive and joyous, and moreso than all, grateful in my deepest heart of hearts. I shall never manage to return that deep insight and care to its grantor, although I mean to try. Thank you, love. From my heart to yours. 

 “With this condition, what else would I be?”

Growing up there was always that aloneness. Always that sense that somehow or another I had been born into a world where there was absolutely no one who would ever understand any of me. That has turned out to be yet another landmark that disappeared, or changed, so it looked very different when I approached it than it did when I saw it at a distance.

Some do understand, at least in part. That is a blessing. Some even love me, a deeper, richer blessing. Best, some come when least expected to change my vision, to call up from me the wellsprings of Life itself and the laughter and warmth of companionship, like a dance in candlelight, warm breath on a shoulder, the scent of memory, or possibility, in a garden of delight: Life. 

 

The Bridge to Somewhere: Building Friendship

September 30, 2008

Over the years I’ve come to discover that there are people I connect with much better than I connect with others. For instance, I like an ability in my friends to provide meaningful thinking. The thinking may not always be practical, but it’s smart and I find it worth listening to, or reading.  I also find myself attracted to people who think outside the box, who can take a thought and sort of turn it around and examine more than simply one side of it.

They look at other sides that perhaps most of us don’t bother to even think of as being possible. They show me, and others who talk with, sit with, and write with them, that maybe not everything is as nice and tidy as a professor in Econ 101 might leave one thinking it is.  I woke up today and found a note, it was innocuous, but made me smile. And now it’s making me think.

That is so sweet, thank you. Blah day at work so needed that boost. We are good for each other. *return hug*

That’s not a lot is it? But, when I read it I found myself feeling a bit warm. I felt like somehow across great distance a bridge was being built, and crossed. One knows not exactly where the bridge leaves and where it finishes, just that it’s there and should be taken care of. 

My possible friend, you see, lives across, very literally, the Earth. She teaches and studies in New Zealand. I find her a breath of fresh air for she knows things. She knows things that I think I know as well. Thus, that bridge-building that might, I hope, allow us to communicate and allow friendship to grow.       

 

he masonry Bridge of 33 Arches over the Zayandeh River is the epitome of Safavid dynasty (1502-1722,) Isfahan, Iran  Photo by Shahab Maghami.

The masonry Bridge of 33 Arches over the Zayandeh River is the epitome of Safavid dynasty (1502-1722,) Isfahan, Iran Photo by Shahab Maghami.

Bridges start out as rickety affairs. Very few take the shape of the Golden Gate or The Bridge of 33 Arches in Isfahan, Iran, the one pictured in the photo. Someone at one time started crossing the Zayandeh River at the place that bridge was built. Perhaps later a bridge was made there, but became obsolete or in some other way was no longer useful. Now, there is this bridge that was built a few hundred years ago and that Mr. Maghami captured so well with his camera. 

So began this possible friendship for me. The woman I am talking about simply saw my name and was intrigued by it, asked me about my name because she found it pretty, and unusual. As we discussed names we found, in some strange fashion that often arises serendipitously, that her middle name and my first one, although very different, hold within them a rhyme of sorts.

Her middle name honors Mary Magalene who, it’s said, was the closest companion of Jesus. My name, as I’ve written, honors the cowherder woman Radha, closest companion of Krishna. It was a nice coincidence.

But I think I was most taken by an exchange she had yesterday with a man.

I realized in that exchange that whomever he thought he was talking to he wasn’t talking with her.

She: Why’s the road to self-harm unblemished while the road to self-esteem is pitted and booby-trapped. 

He: Maybe because we shouldn’t get so wrapped up in ourselves…

She: I guess as a rabid Republican you’d support the rampant greed that has seen Wall Street and your economy brought to its knees. That has nothing to do with being ‘wrapped up in ourselves’, does it? I guess it’s OK to be self-obsessed if you have a home in the Hamptons. 

 Ouch! He could never grok the breadth of her, the sense that she knew more, simply as a matter of having lived her life, than he would be likely to ever learn himself. That, perhaps, would only be because she has never had the surety of herself that allows him to make his flippant, bored, facile comment in the first place.

My hoped-for friend, you see, is another of us skin-jobs: a woman who has a transsexed-history. I’ve often thought that much as we, in groups to ourselves, like to talk about our own intelligence, we miss the point, the core of where that intelligence comes from. I think it comes from simply being, for so very long and so very deeply, alone inside one’s self. That lonliness marks us all, it seems to me. Every skin-job knows lonliness.

To be a transsexual is to struggle (at least for now.) The struggle is always internal, a living conundrum that leaves one imagining just what it might be like to share a life with all those other people “out there.” For life, when one is cisgendered, is more fully a matter of out-there due to the fact that one can simply walk about being one’s self without any of the cognitive dissonance that comes from living a life where a body doesn’t match a soul, a brain, a mind.

We are not better, just more introspective. For most of us that was the only path allowed us freely. Interiors,their design and arrangements, are the mark of the skin-job. It is there we can live our lives unhampered and unimpeded by those niggly caveats such as: ” Do you know what you are saying? That’s just impossible, no one will accept that! No, you are not going to grow up to be a woman. Now, shut it up and just live with what you have.”

There are much worse and much harsher words that we have heard and hear. There are much harsher and unrelenting demands to forget, to suppress, to simply “grow out of this phase” that are brought to bear on many, if not most, of us as we grow, as we live.

The only place we find some semblance of acceptance and understanding becomes interior space. Thus, we plumb and struggle with our interiors in ways that I suspect most ordinary people don’t have to struggle. 

He: You are extraordinarily introspective.

She: With this, what else am I to be?

Indeed, what else? Where, when one is ten or twenty-three, does one truly and completely embrace who she is? I suspect that for most people here, in America, there’s the luxury of allowing whom I am to unfold gradually. Yet, there are those who live among us for whom that gradual knowledge cannot be gradual for us to survive. It’s one thing to awaken every morning with the deeply embedded and almost hereditary knowledge that one is “at the top of the world.” It’s another to awaken every morning and realize that the struggle begins again, every day.  

Somehow I imagine that many other women, many people of color, can understand, if they think for a second, exactly where and how that mechanism of mind and being works. For they, too, in many ways are generally left on the outside looking in. We look on the inside of ourselves; and after looking compare what we see with what is out there to see. I suspect that for many what is out there matches quite well what is in here

I think she realizes, this woman I would like to know better, from across an ocean and a continent the things that disturb me, but do not disturb her interlocutor of last evening. I would be willing to guess that those same worries and possibilities have occurred to my letter-writing friend I referred to yesterday and to Monica Roberts over at Trans Griot. They’ve probably also occurred to my friend Zoe Brain as she views the world through her Neo-Con eyes over in Oz.  

The possibilities are these as laid out by Scott Thill in his Alternet column this morning. Will they come to pass? None of us know that they will or will not. Those who might be able to tell us, President Bush, Vice-President Cheney, have this habit of maintaining that all is well and we needn’t know anything about the “big-picture” since it doesn’t concern any of us, just themselves. But there are those of us who can read the nuances of the entrails, the dreams of others, simply because we’ve had to do so in order to live our own lives with some relative safety. We haven’t had the chance to awaken every morning and just know that the world is our oyster and that we are “the greatest people, the greatest nation, the world has ever known.

This essay isn’t a call to fear, just a meditation on friendship and its importance. It’s a meditation on our lives, especially those of us outsiders who stare through the large department store windows of Christmas-time and wish. Just for a moment, we wish we could dress the way those mannikins dress, knowing we cannot afford the price of being simply care-free and unthinking. For to stay alive, we have to think, to understand, to anticipate. There lies friendship for me, among those who’ve had to find ways to protect our lives and yet want to reach out to others, not simply those like ourselves, for friendship. But to those hands, those hearts, that could fill a life and bring a knowledge of exteriors as well as that we already have of interiors. 

If the other isn’t available, then I shall yearn for the thoughtful touch of a sister, or a brother, another who knows how deeply intertwined one must become with herself in order to negotiate a passage on earth. I’ll freely accept the intimacy that arrives with knowing one whose life, although very different, partakes of that crooked angle-of-vision that comes by way of self-preservation, yet isn’t desperate or fearful, but’s willing to risk danger from simply opening to another, even the other.

What we fashion imperially is an empire of the soul, the heart, willing one another to meet and embrace over a chasm so deep and wide it seems unbridgeable. How to connect to that foreign country, the mind of another? One must simply make the effort and allow what occurs to be enough. 

NOCTURNE GALANT

She stalked like a goddess on carpet
through our two-star rented room,
indifferent to her bare bottom
or the cruelties of perfume

that drifted up from the whores
who kissed on the neon walk
the Marines who gave nothing but money
and got nothing back but talk.

Our argument lasted till midnight,
the right of it nothing but wrong.
I laughed in my borrowed tuxedo.
She cried into her sarong.

True love would climb the Himalayas
or drink the Amazon dry
and promise to promise forever
but never ask a girl why

true love has the tongue of a tyrant
who makes the traitor confess
to treasons he has not committed.
The poet knows little or less.

And no one remembers the reasons,
the boring and terminal sighs,
the casualties of inbreeding,
the crocodile tears in her eyes.

I promised her that I’d be faithful
with all my faithless heart
for a month or until next Tuesday.
Love lies, and so does art.

From: Vain Empires,

(C) 1998 William Logan All rights reserved. ISBN: 0-14-058894-9

It’s all a risk, bridge-building. One begins to lay down piers, knowing full-well that perhaps the river’s deeper than one thought, the current stronger, or that the piers may not hold the weight of the traffic required for friendship, for the quiet places of the soul, for connection. Still, one starts the piers and the roadwork hoping that her calculations will be exact enough to have the builder from the other side match meeting points and the bridge will meet aligned, a work of art. 

Lex, I’ve started from my side. Please, meet me mid-stream and we’ll talk? ‘K?

Truth: Do We Speak Our Own Or Remain Silent?

August 21, 2008

Last night I was taken to task on a bulletin board forum for my essay here of two days ago. I was accused of not being “real,” of hiding myself, of being “transphobic” because I had written about my own internal reaction to other women of a transsexual history who through no fault of their own don’t manage to quite “look like woman.” 

I have to admit that when I first read the response I was a bit hurt, a bit angry. But I sat on that for awhile, slept on it for awhile. I have come to the following as a conclusion, or at least as a place where I can live with both my own feelings and feel comfortable with what I write and peoples’ responses to that. 

Each path is individual. That we find sojourners we can embrace and who walk along a path much the same as our own, the path next door, so to speak, is a truly wonderful part of being human. It’s a necessary part of being human; for without friendships, confidantes, people with whom we can share our hearts and lives we are simply doomed to a miserable death. 

Humans are social animals. We define humanity in that way. Without others we are like the exposed babies set out on a hill by the Spartans. We die, alone and pained, starved to death as surely as any child dies without sustenance and holding and caring. 

That the problem of “lookism” among women, and men, of a transsexual history is there, I don’t think anyone with a medical past like mine would tell you is untrue. It does. When you socialize through the internet or in-person with others with a similar history, that “lookism” plays a huge part in the interactions, or lack of interactions. 

It is simply a fact. A fact that many women and men don’t want to actually speak about. Why do we not wish to speak about it? Because we are embarrassed of those feelings no matter which of the two places we come from: those who blend and those who don’t. So, like with the elephant in the room that we all ignore, we simply pretend it isn’t a problem.

Yet, we struggle with it silently. Or we don’t struggle with it at all, we simply state outright: “I will not be with them.” Whomever “them” may be. One way or another we “take that out of relationship.” As with all things in relationship that we ignore and suffer with silently, that causes us problems, causes the relationships we develop problems.

Well, that “taking things out of relationship” is currently a normal human reaction. Neither cissexuals nor transsexuals nor any of the other people who walk through our world are immune from it. We choose our friends, our chosen families, based on our own likes and dislikes and we go about our lives: allied with some and exiled from others. It’s a choice, always a choice.

Since I actually do have contact with other men and women with transsexual histories I decided to write about something that perhaps others would wish I hadn’t written about at all. They are entitled to that wish. They are entitled to take me to task for my essay. But the tactic taken by the person who took me to task last night was one that I basically read as “don’t talk about this because it hurts us all.” 

I see that a lot among other people of transsexual histories. We believe that someone who doesn’t fit the mold we have is “going to make us all look bad.” We decry people who choose or have chosen by their lot in life to not have as many surgeries as others, or who claim a portion of “transgender activism” as hurting us all. There are overwhelmingly expressed concerns on blogs and in bulletin boards that somehow if “all of them” (cissexuals) read about a TS bank robber or see Calpernia Addams on a “Dating-Game” show, or read Autumn Sandeen’s blogs at Pam’s House Blend or on Bilerico, that they will form “negative” opinions about us as a group.   

In my opinion all of those people, yes, even the bank robber actually help the cause of people with a transsexual history. They each and every one place us inside that huge category of “normal humanity.” They live, date, struggle, write, think, play, have and raise their children, go to church, worship in sacred groves, hold down jobs, struggle with mortgages and benighted policies set forth by local, state and federal governments. They take joy in seeing sports events, they walk in parks, swim at public pools, interact with all the rest of humanity and no one knows who they are unless they tell us. 

So, we people of transsexual histories are exactly like other human beings, we bleed, weep, love, shout, kiss, make love, think and do off-hand things just like every other human on the face of the planet. Why would that “make us look bad?”

Are we simply non-human, some alien race that will never ever be accepted among all the “true humans?” Is there truly a “height” we must reach in order to somehow validate our humanity for all those people out there who aren’t exactly like us medically or psychologically? Is there a “level” that people of color or Muslims or Christians must reach before we can accept their humanity? Or is there simply, somewhere inside us all, chains of our own making that keep us all from the glorious variety and sameness that is human being? I opt for the latter choice. 

It was not my wish to hurt or disparage or to demean anyone else with my essay of Monday. It was simply my wish to place in the open a very real concern and a very real problem that I am not alone in dealing with.

Truth to tell, from her reaction to my essay, my critic also has a problem in that regard, although it appears to be from the other direction. It also appears that she has no willingness at this time to actually discuss herself, better to discuss her opinions of others. That is her comfort and no blame can attach to her for that. The point is simply that my comfort is not hers. 

I know, beyond a shadow of doubt that the problem of “lookism” exists within the so-called “transsexual community” That we do not talk about it doesn’t make it disappear. It simply allows it to grow and fester and to out itself with irruptions on bulletin boards, in support groups, and in the blighted hearts of those who will not deal with their own internal selves because to do so would somehow be “to bring calumny on ALL” people with transsexual histories. 

I disgree. For a wound to heal it must be open to the air and be treated with medicine that will prevent infection until the tissue has had time to knit together again. If the infection has already set in, the wound must be cleansed of the pus and the colonies of bacteria or viruses that cause the infection. 

Life, my friends, is a constant opening. It’s a perpetual opening of one’s self to others and of one’s self to one’s self. To do otherwise is to maintain our serious wounds and allow them to fester and infect our entire psyches, and from there to infect our relationships with everyone we come into contact with, every culture we ever live within. To maintain silence and denial over our differences and our similarities, the things we hold most deeply and shamefully in our hearts is to make certain that we will never come to any understanding, to any embrace, with the Other we share our world with. 

Your mileage may vary.

Lookist? On the Beauty Myth and Transsexual Women

August 19, 2008

*sigh* It’s a difficult road to walk, this road that starts with the seemingly insane realization in deepest childhood that something about one’s body just doesn’t make sense. That look-down-and-see-that-you-are-different that begins when you first see someone of the allegedly “opposite” sex has a different shape between her legs than you have.

At first, as I recall, it was a “shrugable,” you know, one of those items that you see and then just shrug and go on wondering at the differences. But, as you play doctor more and more times with your friends you begin to see that they are all the same there and you are different. That’s when the shrugging ends and the true wonderment sets in. Like, “wtf is going on here?”

Of course with all of the conditioning you were receiving you also wondered why you were being touted as being a “real doctor” someday and your friends were gonna be nurses. You wanna be just like them. “Why can’t I be a nurse too?” “Well honey, because boys don’t get to be nurses.”  So it went in the 50s and 60s. Thank Mother for the Second Wave! 

Anyhow by mid-puberty you have ached all you can if you’re going to live and you’ve made one of two choices: 1) make the best of what everyone has told you you must be. Or, 2) you’ve managed to stumble (and in those decades stumbling had a lot to do with where one lived and how much you read and what) onto a story about Christine Jorgenson and decided to see about changing yourself to look a bit more the way you should have looked always. If you were truly fortunate you’d also have found others like you who could help negotiate the twists of the gender-clinics. 

Now, when you do start hormones you can be either 1) very fortunate, or, 2a) not quite so fortunate, or, 2b) not very fortunate at all. What is that all about? Simply this. The suppression of testosterone and the increase of estrogen in one’s body can 1) change body and face in such a way that almost no one is gonna be able to ever tell your etiology and you get to walk through the world being accepted as the girl/woman you happen to be. 2a) Your personal economic situation enables you to buy a new body/face from one of the three or eight major transitional plastic surgeons and then you proceed to be just like 1).

Then of course there is 2b). Ah, that’s the so-called “pathetic” (see Julia Serano, “Skirt-Chasers”  for an explanation) transsexual and you will be consistently “read” and likely shunned by most or many as being “not real.” Even if absolutely everything I have written above down to 1) applies to you as well. That, my dears, is horrendous I am sure. 

You are often not accepted as being the girl/woman you know yourself to be. You can be shunned by cissexuals and by other transsexuals. Even though you are bombarded constantly, just like other women and girls, by the advertising agencies with the same “beauty above all” campaigns that run constantly, you just cannot seem to find a way to make it to the promised land. 

The sad little fact is: this affects your life with not only other women, period; but also with other women of a transsexual history you come into contact with. You get to become a poster-child for the radial feminist lezzie crew who wishes to deconstruct the entire transsexual edifice in the interest of some “greater-good” proposal about maintaining the purity of womanhood and making gender a moot point. After all, there you go “very obviously” a man in a dress.

Yet, for women who fall into 1) and 2a) rad-lezzie feminists will accept us as long as the voice and overt sexual characteristics appear “right.” We can even go to some of their discussion groups and damn to hell the women like us, but like us with a difference. I know, I’ve been to a few of those groups myself.

My dear friend Robin and I have recently found room to talk about this. In doing so we have both found reasons to dislike this visceral reaction we have. We are both pretty much embarassed by our discriminatory feelings about trans-women who don’t blend in well with the vast majority of other women. We both agree that it would be difficult for either of us to be out in public with the 2b)s. *sigh*

It’s a rather embarrassing thing to admit, because through the years I have, and I am sure she has, come to know simply sweet and delightful women who are “beauty challenged.” They resemble “men in dresses.” We agree, though, we each definitely have this “thang” about other women who don’t “look right.” And ya know, the funny thing is that each of us, when we first started chatting developed this idea of the other even though we had never seen each other. 

Of course, I think when we did see each other we were both rather relieved that the “who” we saw fit our mutual ideas of who would be there. Ya see, I’d hate to not want to be around my friend. She’s meant a lot to me over the past year or eighteen months. Someone I can laugh with, talk with about what bothers me, share the little ups-an-downs of daily reality with. She knows my soul, I like to think. Yet, there’s that terrible realization that if she hadn’t conformed to my idea about who she resembled I might have simply gone away without maintaining what has become a very dear friend, in some ways, my best friend. 

She’s told me that she feels the same and so, by chance and good fortune, we’ve been blessed by Mother to blend with other women. We don’t have to “out” ourselves. We get to go to make-up counters and salons, to expensive department stores and pretty much everywhere without having to drag the chains and shackles of our own looks around with us. Or do we?

I’m not going to get much into Naomi Wolf’s wonderful 1991 book: The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty Are Used Against Women. Instead I will give the Wikipedia synopsis of the relevant information. 

Wolf argues that women in Western culture are damaged by the pressure to conform to an idealized concept of female beauty—the Iron Maiden throughout modern society, from Victorian Times to today. She argues that the beauty myth is political, a way of maintaining the patriarchal system. It allows women to enter the labour force, but under controlled conditions. She also claims that this system keeps women under control by the weight of their own insecurities.

There’s the key, Robin and I are insecure simply because of the way others “look.” We are afraid, I suppose, that somehow we will be seen for our etiologies rather than as who we are. You see, we also know that pain: the pain of being regarded as “different.” That was the reason we each transitioned. We didn’t like being looked at that way, as poseurs, as “not real.” 

Yet, we each in our own ways have come to propagate that same feeling within ourselves and often now apply it in our own lives. I used to cringe when I worked at a Philadelphia clinic that both employed and served transsexuals. When I went outside and stood among other women with a transsexual history I always felt anxious. Please don’t stand too close. Please don’t anyone think I am “one of them.” I didn’t want to be “outted.” *sigh*

Yes, it’s a shallow way to walk through the world, I’m afraid. This judging of myself by judging others. It’s not something I am either proud of or satisfied to maintain within myself. For, you see, I’m also experienced enough to know that women with transsexual histories don’t “pass” throughout our lives and I am simply not willing to endanger that by being in a group of them unless they all meet my standard of the “beauty myth.”

I’ve waited so long to simply be myself. I’ve learned that a person can actually fly in this life. She can soar and touch the clouds, regardless how she was born. And I also know that Mother was kind to me in my genetics and in what estrogen has done to my physical form. Things could have worked-out much differently and I get that. I’m grateful, for I have never had the money to spend on both genital reconstruction and on facial and body contouring.

Life deals us strange cards. I’m certain that there are women like me out there who have lived through boatloads of pain and continue to do so. Women who get catcalls about their “mannish” looks from guys on street corners, snickers from other women in stores and outright jaw-dropping rudeness from strangers. That hurts and frustrates. (I can recall that from my “androgenous” period when I intiated my transition.)

Now my quest is how I can stop being as shallow as I have been, making judgements based on how other women look, women designated girls and women designated boys. At least Robin and I talk about this and manage to find some ways through it. I have a friend. What happens to those who cannot find a friend to discuss such things with? What happens to those who are shunned, both externally by others, and more deadly, internally by themselves?

“Being myself” is never an easy path for any human, I think. We are bound by so many chains of conditioning, social, cultural and familial/personal, that the task to break-through to one’s own self can be most daunting. Yet, to reach a point where many of those chains have dropped away can be the absolute most refreshing and envigorating experiences of one’s life!

Robin sent me an email last night and in it captured a sense that I know all too well:

“They depress me a lot and they are a constant reminder that I was born with the wrong parts.  Even though I have already corrected that, being among people that know about “my past” even if they don’t know how I look like or whatever, makes me cringe with anger.  Sorry, but I think I have already reached the sky and I am NOT willing to come down for any reason.”    

I agree, flying is enjoyable. For the first time in my life I can fly. There isn’t that niggling notion that somehow I am without wings. It’s a state that we should all be able to find and revel in. So, sisters, no matter how you look I do empathize and care. Please forgive my shallowness. 

It’s the shallow parts I have to find ways through, beauty never lasts forever and although friends and loved-ones don’t either, they certainly make the flying a bit more comfortable than being without them ever is. Perhaps working out this silly buy-in I’ve bought into will get easier for me. I know, once more, that it’s a struggle I share with others, whether they speak about it or not. At least I have one friend I can talk about it with.

Some crosses are simply more visible than others. Time to pick-up this one and maybe carry it to an alley somewhere and just drop it. Just have to figure out how to get off the chains that bind me to it.


Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started