Cool! I was thinking about this too 🙂 Well thinking of stopping the use of List[] type annotations and instead use list[] style type annotations.

Thanks for doing this!

Once we (in reality you) get this done, we should do a follow-up adding the commit to .git-blame-ignore-revs which I'm sure you have already thought of.

Once we (in reality you) get this done, we should do a follow-up adding the commit to .git-blame-ignore-revs which I'm sure you have already thought of.

I was thinking of that as well, especially now that I see how big the diff is 😅 Maybe after this PR in case there's more rebasing etc.

I'll just need to tweak the type hint tests for this now.

I'll rebase this after #3083 to avoid too many conflicts there, and that will likely fix the typing issues altogether.

@JohnVillalovos this one's a chunky one now, but mostly auto-generated 😅

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 99.71910% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 97.28%. Comparing base (91c4f18) to head (49107f5).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3010      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.25%   97.28%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          97       97              
  Lines        5932     5975      +43     
==========================================
+ Hits         5769     5813      +44     
+ Misses        163      162       -1